A Disguised Loan Agreement Didn’t Create a ‘Fair Ground of Doubt’ Under Taggart
Debtors Have a Narrow Window in ‘13’ to Redeem Foreclosed Property, BAP Says
A Mortgage Deficiency Judgment Is a Judicial Lien Subject to Avoidance Under § 522(f)
A Consensual Judgment Is a Judgment Lien Subject to Avoidance Under Section 522(f)
Giving Debtors Their Fair Shake: What Happens to Nonexempt Equity Increases in Debtors’ Homes in Converted Chapter 7 Cases
Giving Debtors Their Fair Shake: What Happens to Nonexempt Equity Increases in Debtors’ Homes in Converted Chapter 7 Cases By Andrew Bates 1 Following decisions from the Eighth and Ninth Circuits, chapter 13 filers could find themselves in a difficult predicament
Barring Use of an Online Payment Platform Was an Automatic Stay Violation
Two Courts Rule on Chapter 7 Debtors’ Standing for Objections to Sales and Claims
The Wrath of Res Judicata: A Creditor’s Cautionary Tale
In In re Smith, [1] the Third Circuit reminded consumer bankruptcy practitioners of the wrath of res judicata. The debtor owned an encumbered rental property with an assignment of rents to her mortgage lender. The debtor’s proposed chapter 13 plan included a cramdown of the mortgage lender’s claim that reduced the secured portion of the claim from $150,000 to $95,000 — the value of the collateral. The plan further provided that the payment of rents would pay down the secured portion of the lender’s claim.
The lender objected to the $95,000 cramdown value, the application of rents to the secured portion of its claim, and feasibility. After the bankruptcy court sided with the debtor and held that the rents could pay down the secured portion of the lender’s claim, the lender agreed to the $95,000 cramdown value and abandoned its feasibility objections. The bankruptcy court confirmed the plan.