Chapter 11 Plan May Impair a Mortgage When the Debtor Is Not Liable on the Debt
A chapter 11 plan may not impair the rights of a mortgage lender against a co-owner who is not in bankruptcy.
A Wholly Unsecured Lien May Be Stripped Off Even if It Predated Ownership
Bankruptcy Judge Michelle Harner held that a wholly unsecured, subordinate lien may be stripped off in chapter 13 even if the lien arose before the debtor owned the property.
Ninth Circuit Employs Equity to Avoid Following the Supreme Court’s Taylor and Schwab
Claiming 100% of FMV didn’t enable debtors to exempt more than the statutory cap when there had been no objection to the exemption claim.
Tyler Applied Retroactively to Set Aside a Judgment of Tax Foreclosure
Tyler was applied retroactively because the debtor’s efforts to set aside a tax foreclosure judgment were ‘in the pipeline’ when bankruptcy began.
Circuits Split: Does Anti-Modification Apply to Any Property with a Principal Residence?
Eleventh Circuit seems to hold that a mortgage on any property with a principal residence can’t be modified even if the principal use of the property is commercial.
Another Circuit Says Creditors Take Appreciation When a ‘13’ Case Converts to ‘7’
The Eighth Circuit aligned with the Ninth Circuit by holding that postpetition appreciation in a home belongs to creditors when a chapter 13 case converts to chapter 7.
Benchnotes January 2024
Benchnotes By Bradley D. Pack, Aaron M. Kaufman and Christina Sanfelippo BAPCPA Did Not Abrogate Absolute-Priority Rule in Chapter 11 Cases Hon. Peter D. Russin of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida recently ruled that the absolute-priority
‘13’ Debtors May Bifurcate Mortgages that Mature Before the Final Plan Payment
The Ninth Circuit BAP says that a later valuation can make a debtor eligible for chapter 13 when the original schedules meant ineligibility.
Even Without Personal Liability, a Mortgage on a Debtor’s Property Is a ‘Claim’
The ‘broad’ definition of ‘claim’ by the Supreme Court in Johnson led Judge Huennekens to hold that in rem rights against a debtor’s property give rise to a ‘claim.’