Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
To avoid an inequitable result, the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel relied on fundamental principles about secured claims in chapter 7 to conclude that an order declaring a secured claim to.....
If the debtor received a discharge of personal liability on a home mortgage in a prior bankruptcy, subsequently confirming a chapter 13 plan and keeping the home may not be a piece of cake, as.....
Employing strategies for several years to avoid paying income taxes can make the debts nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(1)(C), even for taxes due more than three years before bankruptcy.
Bankruptc.....
Brooklyn Bankruptcy Judge Elizabeth S. Stong nixed sophistic arguments that would have gutted Sections 109(g) and 362(b)(21) by allowing the automatic stay to halt foreclosure against a debtor whose.....
Perhaps on a longshot, creative counsel advanced a theory that would have made many homeowners immune from the test for presumption of abuse under Section 707(b)(2)(A)(i) if a home mortgage were.....
Affirming the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the Ninth Circuit explained why the costs of an attorney’s disciplinary proceeding are not dischargeable in California. Paradoxically, similar costs from.....
If a chapter 13 debtor dies before confirmation, it stands to reason that the case should be dismissed because the debtor can’t file a plan, has no regular income and can’t be examined by creditors.
Th.....
Circuit Judge Thomas L. Ambro has written another gem.
For the Third Circuit in an opinion on September 3, Judge Ambro drew the boundaries between the rules of preclusion and the Rooker-Feldman doctrin.....
In Tyler v. Hennepin County, 598 U.S. 631 (2023), the Supreme Court held that a real estate tax foreclosure can violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment when a municipality takes title but.....
The automatic stay did not protect an individual debtor from the creditor’s collection of a $20,000 award of liquidated damages for the debtor’s violation of a prepetition state court injunction, nor.....