Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
Section 522(g) prevents a debtor from claiming an exemption in property that a trustee recovers if the transfer by the debtor was voluntary. In other words, a debtor cannot claim a homestead exemption.....
Some exemption planning is permissible, but Bankruptcy Judge Pamela W. McAfee of Raleigh, N.C., had a case where it went too far. Indeed, marriage can be a badge of fraud.
In an opinion on February 13.....
Section 1307(a) gives a chapter 13 debtor the right to dismiss when confronted with a motion for conversion to chapter 7.
The majority in a recent Sixth Circuit opinion held that the right to dismiss.....
Based on the broad definition given the word “claim,” a creditor has standing to bring a nondischargeability suit against an individual debtor for embezzlement when the debtor didn’t embezzle from the.....
On a question where there is precious little authority, Bankruptcy Judge Janet S. Baer of Chicago decided that Bankruptcy Rule 9006(b) and equitable tolling permit an extension of the two-year.....
Under any of the three tests, allegations of domestic abuse are “personal injury tort claims” under Section 157(b)(5), according to the Eighth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
Of greater.....
With limited exceptions, traditional law says that chapter 7 debtors lack standing to object to proofs of claim. In a nonprecedential opinion, the Eleventh Circuit upheld dismissal of a debtor’s.....
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Ritzen that an order granting or denying relief from the automatic stay is a final, appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry.....
Affirming the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the Ninth Circuit explained why the costs of an attorney’s disciplinary proceeding are not dischargeable in California. Paradoxically, similar costs from.....
Circuit Judge Thomas L. Ambro has written another gem.
For the Third Circuit in an opinion on September 3, Judge Ambro drew the boundaries between the rules of preclusion and the Rooker-Feldman doctrin.....