Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
Anyone who gambles incessantly risks bankruptcy and the denial of discharge without adequate documentation of gambling losses.
Bankruptcy Judge Timothy A. Barnes of Chicago wrote an opinion listing.....
In an area where the courts are split and the Fourth Circuit has no precedent, Bankruptcy Judge John E. Waites of Columbia, S.C., decided that the Bankruptcy Code allowed him to attach conditions when.....
If the law changes, neither judicial estoppel nor law-of-the-case prevents the debtor from objecting to the classification of a claim that was treated as having priority in a confirmed chapter 13 plan.....
On a question where the courts are split, Bankruptcy Judge Beth E. Hanan of Milwaukee extrapolated from Seventh Circuit authority to hold that a discharge terminates liability that arises after filing.....
A district judge in Chicago lamented how the Supreme Court and the Seventh Circuit have curtailed the ability of federal courts to enforce some consumer protection laws.
A discharged bankrupt filed a.....
In the wake of Taggart, an appellate decision from North Carolina demonstrates how lawyers and courts must draft orders and plans with specificity, otherwise allegedly offending creditors can’t be.....
Respectfully, something is wrong with a law that won’t allow a 68-year-old woman to discharge all of her student loans quickly and easily when her $43,000 annual income won’t cover her basic living.....
In Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (2014), the Supreme Court held that individual retirement accounts inherited before bankruptcy are not exempt and belong to creditors. It follows, does it not, that a.....
Although she would have reached “a very different conclusion” if a dissent had been governing authority in the Fourth Circuit, Bankruptcy Judge Michelle M. Harner of Baltimore temporarily halted.....
With qualifications implying that all chapter 13 debtors may not qualify, Chief Bankruptcy Judge Helen E. Burris of Spartanburg, S.C., sided with the majority and allowed the debtor to continue making.....