Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
Bankruptcy Judge John E. Waites, sitting in Columbia, S.C., refused to compel arbitration of “core” bankruptcy issues. Not surprising.
In a case involving a consumer, he also decided that.....
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit used a case involving the split of authority over Section 1322(c)(1) to opine on the binding effect of a BAP opinion on a later BAP panel in the.....
Although holding a hearing on a contempt motion in state court may not violate the automatic stay, the remedy imposed by the state court may nonetheless violate the stay, according to Bankruptcy Judge.....
Given the “exceptional facts” of the case, the Third Circuit upheld the constitutional power of a bankruptcy court to grant nonconsensual, third-party releases.
Indeed, the circumstances were.....
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in City of Chicago v. Fulton, 19-357 (Sup. Ct.), to resolve a circuit split and decide whether inaction can violate the automatic stay under Section 362.....
While closing one door, the Supreme Court opened another door today for debtors to argue that the statute of limitations does not begin to run until discovery of the existence of a claim under the.....
As a matter of constitutional law, the Seventh Circuit reduced punitive damages from $3 million to $582,000 when the jury had awarded the debtor $582,000 in compensatory damages as a consequence of.....
An opinion from the Eighth Circuit shows the injustice that seemingly results from slavish adherence to the statute demanded by Law v. Segal, 571 U.S. 415 (2014), where the Supreme Court held that the.....
To give better definition to what is or is not a final, appealable order in a bankruptcy case, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry LLC, 18-938 (Sup. Ct.). The.....
The Seventh Circuit slammed the door on another theory used by bankrupt citizens of Chicago to avoid paying traffic tickets and parking fines incurred while in chapter 13.
In March, the Chicago-based.....