Does Truck Insurance Give Chapter 7 Debtors Standing to Mount Claim Objections?
The lack of ‘pecuniary interest’ may deprive a chapter 7 debtor of constitutional standing, even though the debtor is a ‘party in interest.’
Courts Must Use Inherent Powers for Sanctions on Pro Se Litigants, Eleventh Circuit Says
In a nonprecedential opinion, the Eleventh Circuit holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1927 may not be used to impose monetary sanctions on pro se litigants.
Eleventh Circuit: Chapter 13 Debtor Keeps Settlement of a Personal Injury Claim
What’s a settlement of a personal injury claim? Is it income earmarked for creditors in chapter 13?
The Supreme Court’s Acevedo Doesn’t Preclude Annulling the Stay, Eleventh Circuit Says
The Eleventh Circuit rejected the idea that a Supreme Court decision could nullify a provision in the Bankruptcy Code.
Segal v. Rochelle May Remain Good Law Only in Limited Circumstances
The elaborate definition of ‘estate property’ in Section 541(a) may have superseded the 1966 ‘sufficiently rooted’ analysis in Segal.
The ‘Domestic Violence’ Stay Exception Applies to Sexual Violence Decades Earlier
Bankruptcy Judge Robert Mark held that the Section 362(b)(2)(A)(v) exception to the automatic stay covers more than imminent or ongoing sexual abuse.
‘Notice’ in Rule 3002(c)(7) Means Notice of the Bar Date, Not Notice of the Case
Bankruptcy Judge Scott Grossman adopted the analysis by Bankruptcy Judge Brian Walsh in concluding that creditors are entitled to notice of the claims bar date, not just notice of the filing.
‘Accrual Test’ Again Survives to Say Whether the Debtor or the Estate Owns a Claim
There are two tests again for the existence of a claim, one test for claims against the debtor and another for claims by the debtor.
Judicial Immunity Can Protect a Trustee when Barton Doesn’t Apply, Circuit Says
When a trustee mistakenly seizes a nondebtor’s property, the Barton doctrine by itself doesn’t protect the trustee, but judicial immunity does.
Circuits Split: Does Anti-Modification Apply to Any Property with a Principal Residence?
Eleventh Circuit seems to hold that a mortgage on any property with a principal residence can’t be modified even if the principal use of the property is commercial.