Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
On a question where there is precious little authority, Bankruptcy Judge Janet S. Baer of Chicago decided that Bankruptcy Rule 9006(b) and equitable tolling permit an extension of the two-year.....
Under any of the three tests, allegations of domestic abuse are “personal injury tort claims” under Section 157(b)(5), according to the Eighth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
Of greater.....
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a circuit split on the standard to employ before invoking judicial estoppel when a chapter 13 debtor failed to disclose a personal injury claim.
The date.....
With limited exceptions, traditional law says that chapter 7 debtors lack standing to object to proofs of claim. In a nonprecedential opinion, the Eleventh Circuit upheld dismissal of a debtor’s.....
Reversing the district court and upholding a decision by Bankruptcy Judge Scott H. Gan of Tucson, Ariz., the Ninth Circuit held that issue preclusion does not prevent a debtor from successfully.....
Regarding the right of a chapter 13 debtor to dismiss a case filed in bad faith, Bankruptcy Judge Stacey L. Meisel of Newark, N.J., said it all in the second paragraph of her opinion:
A Chapter 13.....
When a bank had personal guarantees from both the husband and wife, the bank had only one claim in the couple’s joint chapter 7 case, for reasons explained by Bankruptcy Judge Rachel M. Blise of.....
Perhaps on a longshot, creative counsel advanced a theory that would have made many homeowners immune from the test for presumption of abuse under Section 707(b)(2)(A)(i) if a home mortgage were.....
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Ritzen that an order granting or denying relief from the automatic stay is a final, appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry.....
Affirming the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the Ninth Circuit explained why the costs of an attorney’s disciplinary proceeding are not dischargeable in California. Paradoxically, similar costs from.....