Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel explained why “extremely narrow relief [is] available to a chapter 13 debtor who files bankruptcy to save [her] property after confirmation of a judicial.....
A district judge in Virginia held that a debtor’s appeal from an order confirming the debtor’s chapter 13 plan was equitably moot.
In his December 11 opinion, District Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff of.....
At least in the Third Circuit, it’s permissible for a bankruptcy judge to give the debtor a grace period to cure a default beyond the five-year life of a chapter 13 plan, according to a decision by a.....
Laying the groundwork for the Supreme Court to grant certiorari and resolve a circuit split, the Ninth Circuit ruled that voluntary contributions to a retirement plan are not counted as disposable.....
Questions under chapter 13 can be complex, but the issue confronting Bankruptcy Judge Laura K. Grandy of East St. Louis, Ill., was off the charts.
Two people purchased a car together, taking title in.....
Since the CARES Act has expired, the bankruptcy court cannot now amend a confirmed chapter 13 plan while retaining an 84-month duration of the plan. For reasons explained in an opinion by Bankruptcy.....
Although his decision favored the debtor, an opinion by Bankruptcy Judge Brian C. Walsh of St. Louis shows how citizens with low incomes are poorly served by the Bankruptcy Code and meager state.....
The broad language in Harris v. Viegelahn, 575 U.S. 510 (2015), does not obviate a chapter 13 trustee’s obligation duty to pay administrative expenses when a chapter 13 case is converted to chapter 7.....
Bankruptcy Judge Christopher J. Panos of Boston joined the majority of courts by holding that a Subchapter V plan may affect a mortgage even when the debtor was not a maker of the mortgage and is not.....
In a chapter 13 case, the local rules barred chapter 13 debtors’ plans from revesting estate property in the debtor until final decree. The bankruptcy court refused to confirm a plan with a provision.....