Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a circuit split on the standard to employ before invoking judicial estoppel when a chapter 13 debtor failed to disclose a personal injury claim.
The date.....
The exception in the automatic stay for “domestic violence” applies to claims for sexual abuse arising decades earlier, not only to claims of imminent or ongoing sexual abuse, says Bankruptcy Judge.....
Ruling on an issue that has “has divided and confounded bankruptcy courts for years,” Bankruptcy Judge Scott M. Grossman of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., decided that the “notice” referred to in Bankruptcy.....
While it’s beginning to look at lot like Christmas, it’s also beginning to look like the accrual test will decide whether a claim belongs to the debtor, not to the debtor’s bankrupt estate. At the.....
At the end of the term, the Supreme Court decided a nonbankruptcy case that puts to rest several bankruptcy questions arising in the wake of Northern Pipeline, Granfinanciera and Stern v. Marshall.
In.....
In the world of bankruptcy, the validity of the doctrine of equitable mootness is an issue that the Supreme Court has been ducking. On March 19, the Court handed down a non-bankruptcy decision on.....
Because there is not yet a split of circuits, it’s not surprising that the Supreme Court yesterday denied two petitions for certiorari asking the justices to decide whether the fees of chapter 13.....
Bankruptcy Judge Scott M. Grossman of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., explained why “merely selling a debt to another holder” does not “somehow immunize a creditor and create a fair ground of doubt as to.....
Narrowly interpreting Rooker-Feldman in light of more recent authority, a district judge in Tampa, Fla., held that the doctrine did not apply to someone who was not a party to the suit in state court.....
Over a dissent by Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson held for herself and six other justices that Section 106(a) of the Bankruptcy Code waives sovereign immunity as to tribes of.....