Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
Counsel in California, beware: The state’s reciprocal fee-shifting statute means that the losing side — whether it be the debtor, the trustee or the creditor — pays the adversary’s attorneys’ fees if.....
Directing a vulgar insult at a debtor is no violation of the automatic stay. Indeed, basing a contempt motion on a text message to a debtor that said, “You’re such a piece of s—t,” “has absolutely no.....
A lender and its lawyer were sanctioned under Bankruptcy Rule 9011 for filing a dischargeability complaint against a consumer based only on the allegation that it must have been fraud because the.....
Sanctions imposed on a creditor and its lawyers for violating the automatic stay and the discharge injunction may not be the end of the story. As demonstrated in a March 29 opinion by Bankruptcy Judge.....
In Acevedo, the Supreme Court banned nunc pro tunc orders as they were often used by bankruptcy courts. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher D. Jaime of Sacramento, Calif., explained why Acevedo did not bar.....
The standards under Taggart limiting the imposition of contempt sanctions for violating the discharge injunction do not apply when the creditor’s violation of the automatic stay continues after.....