Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
Bankruptcy Judge Scott M. Grossman of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., explained why “merely selling a debt to another holder” does not “somehow immunize a creditor and create a fair ground of doubt as to.....
Narrowly interpreting Rooker-Feldman in light of more recent authority, a district judge in Tampa, Fla., held that the doctrine did not apply to someone who was not a party to the suit in state court.....
A title lender in Alabama once again failed to defeat a debtor who renewed her loan just before filing a chapter 13 petition, but don’t count the lender out just yet. With every setback, the lender is.....
The Eleventh Circuit narrowly read a Florida fee-shifting statute to bar recovery of attorneys’ fees in an avoidance action unsuccessfully brought by a debtor incorporating state fraudulent transfer.....
Personal property is not exempt even if it was purchased with Social Security benefits that were exempt, according to an opinion by Chief District Judge J. Randall Hall of August, Ga., affirming.....
As long as the chapter 13 debtor completes payments under the plan as originally confirmed, Bankruptcy Judge Henry A. Callaway of Mobile, Ala., is allowing the debtor to keep any recovery resulting.....
Taking sides on a question where the courts are split, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit puts chapter 13 debtors at risk of losing their homes if the price of real estate has risen.....
In chapters 12 and 13, the courts are divided on whether a debtor must show “a substantial and unanticipated change in circumstances” to modify a confirmed plan.
Following Eighth Circuit dicta, the.....
The Supreme Court’s decision in Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (2014), does not mean that all inherited IRAs are not exempt. As explained by Chief Bankruptcy Judge Thad J. Collins of Cedar Rapids.....
A decision by Bankruptcy Judge Jason A. Burgess of Jacksonville, Fla., could be read to mean that a creditor who has been notified about a debtor’s bankruptcy violates the automatic stay if the.....