Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
On a topic with sparse authority where the lower courts are divided, Bankruptcy Judge Caryl E. Delano of Ft. Myers, Fla., came down on the side of the debtor by holding that Social Security benefits.....
To bar discharge of a debt for violation of securities laws, Bankruptcy Judge Peter D. Russin of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., held that the debtor must have been a party in the lawsuit finding a violation.....
The target of a lawsuit financed by a litigation funding agreement has neither Article III standing nor prudential standing in the Eleventh Circuit to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order authorizing.....
A law firm has no right to a jury trial and cannot withdraw the reference when the U.S. Trustee goes after sanctions and an injunction for violating Section 526, according to District Judge J. Phil.....
Chapter 13 can sometimes protect recipients of preferences, as shown in an opinion by Bankruptcy Judge William A. Altenberger of Peoria, Ill.
The debtor had made $8,000 in payments to family members.....
Now that the Eleventh Circuit has seemingly abolished the Barton doctrine as protection for estate professionals after bankruptcy cases have closed, an opinion by Bankruptcy Judge Erik P. Kimball.....
A bankruptcy judge in Savannah, Ga., said that a nonprecedential opinion by the Eleventh Circuit was “unpersuasive.” Instead, he followed an earlier precedential opinion from the Eleventh Circuit on a.....
The Eleventh Circuit held that Section 505(a)(2)(C), added by the 2005 BAPCPA amendments, did not have improper retroactive effect. The section bars bankruptcy courts from determining the amount of.....
In Fulton, the Supreme Court ruled that the City of Chicago did not violate the automatic stay under Section 362(a)(3) by refusing to return impounded cars immediately after the owners filed chapter.....
There is no “cause” for modifying the automatic stay when the creditor’s objective is to undo the consequences of disastrous litigation strategy, according to the Eleventh Circuit.
The November 16.....