Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
A law firm has no right to a jury trial and cannot withdraw the reference when the U.S. Trustee goes after sanctions and an injunction for violating Section 526, according to District Judge J. Phil.....
Chapter 13 can sometimes protect recipients of preferences, as shown in an opinion by Bankruptcy Judge William A. Altenberger of Peoria, Ill.
The debtor had made $8,000 in payments to family members.....
In Fulton, the Supreme Court ruled that the City of Chicago did not violate the automatic stay under Section 362(a)(3) by refusing to return impounded cars immediately after the owners filed chapter.....
Anyone who gambles incessantly risks bankruptcy and the denial of discharge without adequate documentation of gambling losses.
Bankruptcy Judge Timothy A. Barnes of Chicago wrote an opinion listing.....
A district judge in Chicago lamented how the Supreme Court and the Seventh Circuit have curtailed the ability of federal courts to enforce some consumer protection laws.
A discharged bankrupt filed a.....
Trimming back the already narrow definition of standing laid down in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), the Supreme Court held 5/4 on June 25 that “an injury in law is not an injury in fact.”.....
Bankruptcy Judge Timothy A. Barnes of Chicago displayed tools a judge can use to help a debtor who may have had a meritorious defense but could not afford to defend a dischargeability suit.
The.....
Auto owners in Chicago sustained a defeat when the Supreme Court held on January 14 that refusing to turn over an impounded car does not violate the automatic stay in Section 362(a)(3). Consequently.....
Reversing the Seventh Circuit and resolving a split among the circuits, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously today “that mere retention of property does not violate the [automatic stay in] section 362.....
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in City of Chicago v. Fulton, 19-357 (Sup. Ct.), to resolve a circuit split and decide whether the automatic stay requires a creditor to turn over.....