Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a circuit split on the standard to employ before invoking judicial estoppel when a chapter 13 debtor failed to disclose a personal injury claim.
The date.....
If a debtor’s income falls below the median after filing and before confirmation, the chapter 13 debtor is entitled to lower the monthly payments and shorten the term of the plan to 36 months, for.....
At the end of the term, the Supreme Court decided a nonbankruptcy case that puts to rest several bankruptcy questions arising in the wake of Northern Pipeline, Granfinanciera and Stern v. Marshall.
In.....
Aggressive bankruptcy planning led a bankruptcy court to deny a couple’s discharges under Section 727(a)(2)(B) for making a post-petition transfer with intent to hinder the chapter 7 trustee.
The.....
In the world of bankruptcy, the validity of the doctrine of equitable mootness is an issue that the Supreme Court has been ducking. On March 19, the Court handed down a non-bankruptcy decision on.....
Because there is not yet a split of circuits, it’s not surprising that the Supreme Court yesterday denied two petitions for certiorari asking the justices to decide whether the fees of chapter 13.....
The receipt of a chapter 7 discharge does not automatically bar a debtor from converting a case to chapter 7, according to District Judge Nancy G. Edmonds of Detroit.
On the other hand, the right to.....
Hon. Mark Randon of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan recently weighed in on an issue that has divided bankruptcy courts over the past few years. Debtors who opt for.....
Over a dissent by Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson held for herself and six other justices that Section 106(a) of the Bankruptcy Code waives sovereign immunity as to tribes of.....
Using powers of equity and common sense, Bankruptcy Judge Daniel S. Opperman of Bay City, Mich., didn’t allow a grinch to steal a disabled man’s IRA.
A chapter 7 debtor was permanently disabled. Before.....