Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
Section 1307(a) gives a chapter 13 debtor the right to dismiss when confronted with a motion for conversion to chapter 7.
The majority in a recent Sixth Circuit opinion held that the right to dismiss.....
In the wake of Schwab v. Reilly, 560 U.S. 770 (2010), Bankruptcy Judge John E. Hoffman, Jr., of Columbus, Ohio, explained when a trustee must or cannot object to a homestead exemption claiming “100%.....
When one defendant among many is in bankruptcy, an order dismissing the complaint as to all of the other defendants isn’t final and isn’t appealable.
However, a December 8 opinion from the Sixth.....
The Sixth Circuit has effectively immunized the U.S. Trustee from paying a debtor’s attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) when the U.S. Trustee is the loser in a contested.....
The receipt of a chapter 7 discharge does not automatically bar a debtor from converting a case to chapter 7, according to District Judge Nancy G. Edmonds of Detroit.
On the other hand, the right to.....
Declining “the request to expand broadly an already questionable doctrine,” the majority on a Sixth Circuit panel held “that the doctrine of equitable mootness has no place in Chapter 7 liquidations.”.....
Venue ping pong is a proper method for putting a case in the improper district, according to Bankruptcy Judge Nicholas W. Whittenburg.
Sitting in Chattanooga, Tenn., Judge Whittenburg’s courthouse is.....
Writing dicta in a nonprecedential opinion, Sixth Circuit Judge Amul R. Thapar cited Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S. 118 (2014), to conclude that the “person aggrieved.....
The Sixth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel barred a debtor from using voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) to avoid the consequences of discovery abuses. More specifically, the factual findings.....
There is no constitutional or statutory right of free access to the nationwide PACER system, even from terminals in the courthouse, according to a terse opinion from a Sixth Circuit judge on a pro se .....