Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
Even though there was benefit only to the debtor and none to the estate, a chapter 13 debtor’s lawyer was entitled to compensation under Section 330(a)(4)(B), an exception to the so-called American.....
Fighting like cats and dogs may be acceptable in a matrimonial case, but not when special counsel represents a debtor who is restructuring her debt in chapter 11.
Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur of.....
Simply filing a motion to extend the deadline for objecting to discharge or dischargeability does not extend the deadline indefinitely, according to District Judge Fred Biery of San Antonio, who.....
A payment to a debtor received within 180 days of bankruptcy as a death beneficiary under an individual retirement account is not estate property that the debtor must turn over to the trustee.....
Bankruptcy Judge Mark A. Randon of Detroit ruled in substance that his district’s model chapter 13 plan violates the “plain language” of Section 1322(d)(1) by requiring payments for more than five.....
On a question where the courts are split, a district judge in Detroit upheld Bankruptcy Judge Thomas J. Tucker by ruling that Social Security benefits can be considered in deciding whether a chapter 7.....
Two judges agreed in their opinions on July 30: The CARES Act, enacted on March 27, cannot be invoked to confirm a chapter 13 plan with a seven-year duration if the plan was confirmed after March 27.....
When the sweeping language of a landmark Supreme Court opinion conflicted with the statute, Chief Bankruptcy Judge Phillip J. Shefferly of Detroit followed the statute.
In Harris v. Viegelahn, 575 U.S.....
In August, Congress adopted the so-called HAVEN Act, which allows military veterans to exclude disability benefits from the calculation of “current monthly income.” In practical terms, the new law.....
A relatively puny case from south Texas involving a false notice under Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1 is making important law on the rule and the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, or FDCPA, 15 U.S.C.....