Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
A district judge in Virginia held that a debtor’s appeal from an order confirming the debtor’s chapter 13 plan was equitably moot.
In his December 11 opinion, District Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff of.....
Bankruptcy Judge Klinette H. Kindred of Alexandria, Va., embraced the concurring opinion in this term’s Bartenwerfer opinion from the Supreme Court by holding that a poor schlub who was an unwitting.....
Congress desperately needs to amend the Bankruptcy Code and decide whether chapter 13 debtors are allowed to retain post-petition appreciation in the value of their homes.
Courts today are divided. In.....
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in City of Chicago v. Fulton, 19-357 (Sup. Ct.), to resolve a circuit split and decide whether inaction can violate the automatic stay under Section 362.....
A district court has held that a creditor may not compel arbitration to determine the allowance of a claim, even if the objection has been coupled with a class action seeking damages for violation of.....