Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
On a question where the bankruptcy courts are divided, Bankruptcy Judge Pamela W. McAfee of Raleigh, N.C., sided with the majority in holding that a chapter 13 debtor does not have standing to compel.....
While it’s beginning to look at lot like Christmas, it’s also beginning to look like the accrual test will decide whether a claim belongs to the debtor, not to the debtor’s bankrupt estate. At the.....
When the Barton doctrine did not apply, the Eleventh Circuit achieved the same result by employing judicial immunity to insulate a bankruptcy trustee who made a mistake by seizing property belonging.....
Over a dissent and in disagreement with the Collier treatise, the Eleventh Circuit created a circuit split by holding that real property with an alternative purpose is subject to the anti-modification.....
The Eleventh Circuit twisted itself in knots to hold that neither Rooker-Feldman nor issue preclusion prevented the bankruptcy court from disregarding an erroneous state court decision saying that an.....
Alleging that a debtor was a net winner in a Ponzi scheme doesn’t state a claim for nondischargeability, even when the debtor has realized an “impossibly high” profit of $93,000 on an investment of $2.....
Bankruptcy Judge Henry A. Callaway of Mobile, Ala., ruled last year that settlement proceeds resulting from postpetition personal injury claims were not disposable income and should not increase.....
Bankruptcy Judge Scott M. Grossman of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., explained why “merely selling a debt to another holder” does not “somehow immunize a creditor and create a fair ground of doubt as to.....
Narrowly interpreting Rooker-Feldman in light of more recent authority, a district judge in Tampa, Fla., held that the doctrine did not apply to someone who was not a party to the suit in state court.....
A title lender in Alabama once again failed to defeat a debtor who renewed her loan just before filing a chapter 13 petition, but don’t count the lender out just yet. With every setback, the lender is.....