Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
Taking sides with the dissenter and disagreeing with the Second Circuit’s majority opinion on August 2, Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo Rodriguez from the Southern District of Texas held that a debtor can.....
Concluding that Law v. Siegel, 571 U.S. 415 (2014), implicitly overruled its own precedent, the Ninth Circuit held on September 1 that a bankruptcy court must dismiss a chapter 13 case on motion by.....
If a creditor doesn’t cash a $230,000 distribution check on an allowed unsecured claim, is the chapter 7 debtor entitled to the funds 10 years later on the idea that the $230,000 represented a surplus.....
In a split decision, the two judges on the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel took sides with the minority of courts around the country by ruling in a nonprecedential opinion that a standing.....
A chapter 13 debtor filed a motion under Section 1307(b) for dismissal of right. Had he succeeded, the debtor would have been entitled to file again and attempt to discharge all his debts, because.....
Chief Bankruptcy Judge Maureen A. Tighe of Woodland Hills, Calif., rejected the U.S. Trustee’s contention that Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Acevedo Feliciano, 140 S. Ct. 696.....
Law v. Siegel didn’t bar the bankruptcy court from employing equitable remedies in all circumstances, according to the Ninth Circuit.
The debtor was a lawyer who represented herself in the circuit. She.....
On an issue where the lower courts are divided, Bankruptcy Judge Marc Barreca of Seattle disagreed with the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel and a fellow bankruptcy judge in the Ninth Circuit.....
By adopting an opinion by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel “in full,” the Ninth Circuit has limited its own precedents constricting a debtor’s ability to exempt a homestead.
In Wolfe v. Jacobson (In re.....
The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel explored what it called “the fringes of the bankruptcy discharge injunction” and the meaning of “personal liability of the debtor” in Section 524(a).
The.....