Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
In an important decision, the Second Circuit held that a creditor may not use an uncontested claim allowance in an offensive use of claim preclusion if it would be “unfair.”
In her August 8 opinion.....
Answering a certified question, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the state’s enlarged homestead exemption applies to creditors whose unsecured claims arose before the exemption was increased.....
He didn’t abolish so-called chapter 20 entirely, but Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Grossman of Central Islip, N.Y., has made it unworkable for many chapter 13 debtors.
The typical chapter 20 case works.....
Someone who finances prosecution of a personal injury claim in New York has nothing more than an unsecured claim if the debtor who holds the claim files bankruptcy before settlement or entry of.....
Observing that some courts have incorrectly interpreted the Brunner test to impose “punitive standards,” Chief Bankruptcy Judge Cecelia G. Morris of the Southern District of New York allowed a debtor.....
Although holding a hearing on a contempt motion in state court may not violate the automatic stay, the remedy imposed by the state court may nonetheless violate the stay, according to Bankruptcy Judge.....