Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
On an issue of first impression, the First Circuit has held that a bankruptcy court need not retain jurisdiction to entertain an alleged debtor’s post-dismissal request for attorneys’ fees under.....
The First Circuit wrote a 47-page dissertation on the invocation of judicial estoppel in bankruptcy cases. Basically, the principle requires more than a demonstration that the party had advanced legal.....
The First Circuit expanded the boundaries of constitutional mootness in a chapter 13 case, and perhaps also in chapter 11.
Even if the bankruptcy court had incorrectly directed the chapter 13 trustee.....