Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
To deny an individual’s discharge under Section 727(a)(5) for failure “to explain satisfactorily” a loss of assets, the First Circuit held that the missing assets need not be substantial.
Objecting to.....
Section 305, not Section 707, is the vehicle for a chapter 7 debtor to dismiss her own case as a result of “debtor’s remorse,” for reasons explained by Chief Bankruptcy Judge Scott M. Grossman of Fort.....
The chapter 7 trustee was on notice that a couple were claiming an unlimited Florida homestead exemption, although they were not entitled to the exemption because they had purchased the property too.....
Counsel in California, beware: The state’s reciprocal fee-shifting statute means that the losing side — whether it be the debtor, the trustee or the creditor — pays the adversary’s attorneys’ fees if.....
The exception in the automatic stay for “domestic violence” applies to claims for sexual abuse arising decades earlier, not only to claims of imminent or ongoing sexual abuse, says Bankruptcy Judge.....
Ruling on an issue that has “has divided and confounded bankruptcy courts for years,” Bankruptcy Judge Scott M. Grossman of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., decided that the “notice” referred to in Bankruptcy.....
While most courts more recently are allowing the debtor to dismiss a chapter 13 case even when creditors prefer conversion to chapter 7, a decision by Bankruptcy Judge Michael A. Fagone of Bangor.....
Without a motion by a creditor or party in interest, the bankruptcy court with the first bankruptcy case has the right, sua sponte, to transfer venue of a subsequently filed case by the same debtor or.....
The broad language in Harris v. Viegelahn, 575 U.S. 510 (2015), does not obviate a chapter 13 trustee’s obligation duty to pay administrative expenses when a chapter 13 case is converted to chapter 7.....
Bankruptcy Judge Christopher J. Panos of Boston joined the majority of courts by holding that a Subchapter V plan may affect a mortgage even when the debtor was not a maker of the mortgage and is not.....