Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
To avoid an inequitable result, the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel relied on fundamental principles about secured claims in chapter 7 to conclude that an order declaring a secured claim to.....
Unless all of a private student loan was used for “qualified higher education expenses,” none of the loan is nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(8)(B).
The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.....
To deny an individual’s discharge under Section 727(a)(5) for failure “to explain satisfactorily” a loss of assets, the First Circuit held that the missing assets need not be substantial.
Objecting to.....
Section 1307(a) gives a chapter 13 debtor the right to dismiss when confronted with a motion for conversion to chapter 7.
The majority in a recent Sixth Circuit opinion held that the right to dismiss.....
The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel wrote a handbook for bankruptcy judges writing vexatious litigant orders with prefiling injunctions.
The panel issuing the per curiam, nonprecedential.....
An important bankruptcy case will be heard en banc in the Ninth Circuit during the week of January 12.
Ideally, several of our readers will file amicus briefs explaining why bankruptcy trustees in.....
Reversing the district court and upholding a decision by Bankruptcy Judge Scott H. Gan of Tucson, Ariz., the Ninth Circuit held that issue preclusion does not prevent a debtor from successfully.....
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Ritzen that an order granting or denying relief from the automatic stay is a final, appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry.....
Affirming the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the Ninth Circuit explained why the costs of an attorney’s disciplinary proceeding are not dischargeable in California. Paradoxically, similar costs from.....
When fraud results in the loss of discharge, it doesn’t necessarily also limit the amount of a state homestead exemption under Section 522(q)(1)(B)(ii), as shown by an opinion from the Ninth Circuit.....