Joining the Tenth Circuit, the Ninth Circuit also has held that chapter 13 trustees are not paid their fees when cases are dismissed before confirmation. The identical issue was argued on February 15 before the Second Circuit.
In short order, we’ll have either unanimity or a split of circuits. A split will give rise to an issue worthy of a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court.
Notably, the Ninth Circuit’s opinion on June 12 adopted reasoning in an amicus brief filed in support of the debtor by the National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center and National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
To deny an individual’s discharge under Section 727(a)(5) for failure “to explain satisfactorily” a loss of assets, the First Circuit held that the missing assets need not be substantial.
Objecting to.....
Counsel in California, beware: The state’s reciprocal fee-shifting statute means that the losing side — whether it be the debtor, the trustee or the creditor — pays the adversary’s attorneys’ fees if.....
Affirming the bankruptcy court, a district judge in Brooklyn identified a loophole allowing chapter 13 debtors in some states to assert a homestead exemption without having the exemption prevent the.....
While most courts more recently are allowing the debtor to dismiss a chapter 13 case even when creditors prefer conversion to chapter 7, a decision by Bankruptcy Judge Michael A. Fagone of Bangor.....
With courts divided on the interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1412 about transferring venue in bankruptcy cases, a district judge in Rochester, N.Y., has adopted the approach from the Southern District of.....
As a more effective and targeted remedy for dismissal of a chapter 13 petition filed in bad faith, New York’s Bankruptcy Judge Philip Bentley dismissed, but with a proviso that the automatic stay in a.....
Without a motion by a creditor or party in interest, the bankruptcy court with the first bankruptcy case has the right, sua sponte, to transfer venue of a subsequently filed case by the same debtor or.....
The powers of a Subchapter V trustee cannot be expanded to authorize the trustee to pursue avoidance actions belonging to the trustee, according to an opinion by District Judge Cathy Seibel of White.....
The broad language in Harris v. Viegelahn, 575 U.S. 510 (2015), does not obviate a chapter 13 trustee’s obligation duty to pay administrative expenses when a chapter 13 case is converted to chapter 7.....
Bankruptcy Judge Christopher J. Panos of Boston joined the majority of courts by holding that a Subchapter V plan may affect a mortgage even when the debtor was not a maker of the mortgage and is not.....