Practice and Procedure

Supreme Court Oct 20, 2025

Cert. Granted on a Circuit Split About Judicial Estoppel for Undisclosed Claims

Amicus briefs are needed so the Supreme Court sees the big picture and understands that creditors can suffer if judicial estoppel is applied indiscriminately.
11th Circuit Sep 3, 2025

Does Truck Insurance Give Chapter 7 Debtors Standing to Mount Claim Objections?

The lack of ‘pecuniary interest’ may deprive a chapter 7 debtor of constitutional standing, even though the debtor is a ‘party in interest.’
New Jersey Sep 29, 2025

Bad Faith Chapter 13 Debtor Permitted to Dismiss Is Tagged with a 2-Year Bar to Refiling

Bankruptcy Judge Meisel implores the Third Circuit to follow other circuits on dismissing bad faith debtors’ chapter 13 petitions but with bars to refiling.
10th Circuit Sep 30, 2025

Lack of Financial Distress Results in Chapter 11 Dismissal for Bad Faith

Lack of financial distress was one of several contributing factors for the Tenth Circuit BAP’s affirmance of dismissal for bad faith filing in chapter 11.
3rd Circuit Sep 3, 2025

Circuit Judge Ambro Scribes the Boundaries Between Rooker-Feldman and Preclusion

A final judgment on an issue in state court doesn’t by itself deprive federal courts of subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the Third Circuit explains.

A Tax Foreclosure Ok Under Tyler Can Still Be a Fraudulent Transfer

A tax foreclosure that isn’t an unconstitutional taking can still be a constructively fraudulent transfer depending on when and how the debtor receives the equity above the delinquent taxes.
11th Circuit Aug 26, 2025

Courts Must Use Inherent Powers for Sanctions on Pro Se Litigants, Eleventh Circuit Says

In a nonprecedential opinion, the Eleventh Circuit holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1927 may not be used to impose monetary sanctions on pro se litigants.
New Mexico Aug 15, 2025

A Disappointed Bidder Didn’t Have Prudential Standing in a Chapter 7 Case

In a chapter 7 case, a disappointed bidder wasn’t required to show Article III standing but was still required to demonstrate prudential standing as falling within the class of persons protected by Section 363.
2nd Circuit Aug 8, 2025

Allowed Claim Can’t Be Used Offensively, Second Circuit Says

Second Circuit barred offensive use of claim preclusion based on ‘fairness’ but hinted that offensive claim preclusion might never be permitted.